Some even say starting to use green energies is not fast enough, and it may even have the opposite effect. In economics this oppositeeffect is called “Jevons Paradox”. The paradox is, when a technologythat uses less resources or cheaper resources emerges, the use of the technology increases so much that it becomes more harmful.
A solution that has been suggested by some activists, is the idea of“degrowth”. “Degrowth” means making an economy smaller. This goesagainst every principle of capitalism. It means a reduction in GDP. Itmeans less money for everyone. There are some activists who think thisis the only way we can save the earth. And they use a lot ofscientific research to prove this. One of the supporters of the ideais the philosopher Kohei Saito. His 2020 book “Capital in the anthropocene” helped spread the idea of “degrowth”.
What do you think? Do you think it is possible? Do you think we will see a day that a woman who says “I’m gonna make you all poor” becomes the prime minister?
Perhaps! The website degrowth.com says some of the principles of “degrowth” are: -An economy and a society that sustains the natural basis of life. -The creation of open, connected, and local economies. -A different way of technological progress. -Real democracy where people truly participate in politics.
These all sound very futuristic and attractive to me.
Some say the word “degrowth” may have unwanted negative effects. TheItalian word “decrescita” which means “a river going back to itsnormal flow after a flood", could have been an alternative. Butactivists who started the movement, think the word “degrowth” is agood choice because it is critical. I wonder, what is theJapanese word Kohei Saito has used for “degrowth”?